[Federal Register: April 3, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 64)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 15719-15720]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr03ap02-5]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 173
[Docket No. 01F-0233]
Secondary Direct Food Additives Permitted in Food for Human
Consumption
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the food
additive regulations to provide for the safe use of acidified sodium
chlorite solutions as an antimicrobial agent in water applied to
processed fruits and vegetables. This action is in response to a
petition filed by Alcide Corp.
DATES: This rule is effective April 3, 2002. Submit written objections
and requests for a hearing by May 3, 2002.
ADDRESSES: Submit written objections to the Dockets Management Branch
(HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments to http://www.fda.gov/
dockets/ecomments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert L. Martin, Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-215), Food and Drug Administration,
5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 202-418-3074.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a notice published in the Federal
Register of May 23, 2001 (66 FR 28525), FDA announced that a food
additive petition (FAP 1A4729) had been filed by Alcide Corp., 8561
154th Ave., NE., Redmond, WA 98052. The petition proposed to amend the
food additive regulations in Sec. 173.325 Acidified sodium chlorite
solution (21 CFR 173.325) to provide for the safe use of aqueous
solutions of acidified sodium chlorite as an antimicrobial agent in
processing waters applied to processed fruits and vegetables.
FDA is using the term ``processed'' consistent with the meaning of
that term set forth in FDA's Antimicrobial Food Additives--Guidance (64
FR 40612, July 27, 1999) (the 1999 guidance). The 1999 guidance
describes FDA's interpretation of its jurisdiction over antimicrobial
substances subsequent to the enactment of the Food Quality Protection
Act of 1996 and the Antimicrobial Regulation Technical Corrections Act
of 1998. The 1999 guidance is consistent with the Environmental
Protection Agency's
[[Page 15720]]
(EPA's) and FDA's joint legal and policy interpretation of ``processed
food'' (63 FR 54532, October 9, 1998). According to the 1999 guidance,
processed fruits and vegetables include those that are ground, chopped,
sliced, cut or peeled, and do not include fruits and vegetables that
simply have leaves, stems, or husks removed. This food additive use of
acidified sodium chlorite is for use in water to which processed fruits
and vegetables are added (e.g., to which fruits and vegetables that
have been ground, chopped, sliced, cut, or peeled are added) in order
to mitigate microbiological organisms on the processed fruits and
vegetables.
Also, as discussed in the 1999 guidance, antimicrobial substances
used to mitigate microbiological organisms on processed food, by adding
such substances to water to which processed food is added, are subject
to regulation as food additives. The petitioned use of acidified sodium
chlorite as an antimicrobial agent in ``processing waters'' is intended
to mitigate microbiological organisms only on the processed fruits and
vegetables that are added to the water. Thus, the petitioned use is
subject to regulation by FDA as a food additive. To the extent that a
manufacturer wants to use acidified sodium chlorite in water to
mitigate microbiological organisms in the water itself or to include
mitigation of microbiological organisms in the water in addition to
those on the processed fruits and vegetables that are added to the
water, the manufacturer would need to petition FDA for that food
additive use, which is outside the scope of this rule. In addition, the
manufacturer would need to consult with EPA to determine whether a
pesticide registration would be required for such use.
FDA is requiring, as part of this regulation, that the use of the
additive be followed by a potable water rinse and a 24-hour holding
period to ensure that there are no detectable residue levels from the
use of the additive on the treated processed fruits and vegetables.
FDA has evaluated the data in the petition and other relevant
material. Based on this information, the agency concludes that the
proposed use of the additive is safe, that the additive will achieve
its intended technical effect, and therefore, that the regulation in
Sec. 173.325 should be amended as set forth below.
In accordance with Sec. 171.1(h) (21 CFR 171.1(h)), the petition
and the documents that FDA considered and relied upon in reaching its
decision to approve the petition are available for inspection at the
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition by appointment with the
information contact person listed above. As provided in Sec. 171.1(h),
the agency will delete from the documents any materials that are not
available for public disclosure before making the documents available
for inspection.
In the notice of filing, FDA gave interested parties an opportunity
to submit comments on the petitioner's environmental assessment. FDA
received no comments in response to that notice.
The agency has considered carefully the potential environmental
effects of this action. FDA has concluded that the action will not have
a significant impact on the human environment, and that an
environmental impact statement is not required. The agency's finding of
no significant impact and the evidence supporting that finding,
contained in an environmental assessment, may be seen in the Dockets
Management Branch (address above) between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
This final rule contains no collections of information. Therefore,
clearance by the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 is not required.
Any person who will be affected adversely by this regulation may
file with the Dockets Management Branch (address above) written
objections by May 3, 2002. Each objection shall be numbered separately,
and each numbered objection shall specify with particularity the
provisions of the regulation to which the objection is made and the
grounds for the objection. Each numbered objection for which a hearing
is requested shall specifically so state. Failure to request a hearing
for any particular objection shall constitute a waiver of the right to
a hearing on that objection. Each numbered objection for which a
hearing is requested shall include a detailed description and analysis
of the specific factual information intended to be presented in support
of the objection in the event that a hearing is held. Failure to
include such a description and analysis for any particular objection
shall constitute a waiver of the right to a hearing on the objection.
Three copies of all documents are to be submitted and are to be
identified with the docket number found in the brackets in the heading
of this document. Any objections received in response to the regulation
may be seen in the Dockets Management Branch (address above) between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 173
Food additives.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and
redelegated to the Director, Center for Food Safety and Applied
Nutrition, 21 CFR part 173 is amended as follows:
PART 173--SECONDARY DIRECT FOOD ADDITIVES PERMITTED IN FOOD FOR
HUMAN CONSUMPTION
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 173 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 342, 348.
2. Section 173.325 is amended by redesignating paragraph (g) as
paragraph (h) and by adding a new paragraph (g) to read as follows:
Sec. 173.325 Acidified sodium chlorite solutions.
* * * * *
(g) The additive is used as an antimicrobial agent in the water
applied to processed fruits and processed root, tuber, bulb, legume,
fruiting (i.e., eggplant, groundcherry, pepino, pepper, tomatillo, and
tomato), and cucurbit vegetables in accordance with current industry
standards of good manufacturing practices, as a component of a spray or
dip solution, provided that such application be followed by a potable
water rinse and a 24-hour holding period prior to consumption. However,
for processed leafy vegetables (i.e., vegetables other than root,
tuber, bulb, legume, fruiting, and cucurbit vegetables) and vegetables
in the Brassica [Cole] family, application must be by dip treatment
only, and must be preceded by a potable water rinse and followed by a
potable water rinse and a 24-hour holding period prior to consumption.
When used in a spray or dip solution, the additive is used at levels
that result in sodium chlorite concentrations between 500 and 1,200
ppm, in combination with any GRAS acid at a level sufficient to achieve
a solution pH of 2.3 to 2.9.
* * * * *
Dated: February 28, 2002.
L. Robert Lake,
Director of Regulations and Policy, Center for Food Safety and Applied
Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 02-7969 Filed 4-2-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
Food Ingredient and Packaging
Foods Home
|
FDA Home
|
Search/Subject Index
|
Disclaimers & Privacy Policy
|
Accessibility/Help
<~--Hypertext updated by cjm 2002-OCT-10-->