Center for Food Safety & Applied Nutrition
Report of 1997 Inspections of |
Attachment 2. State Regulations, Programs and Activities --- Summary of Information Provided
| STATE | REGULATIONS | INSPECTIONS | LABELING | EDUCATION PROGRAMS |
| INFORMATION PROVIDED BY STATES TO FDA | ||||
| California Dept. of Health Services |
* No specific apple regs * Use food processor GMPs
* Have voluntary guidelines
* Have grading requirements |
* Plan to inspect all manuf.
* (Sampling is undecided at this time) |
* No special labeling is required
* Will ask for voluntary labeling |
* Worked with industry to develop voluntary QA guidelines
* Held state-wide meeting with growers/processors to discuss guidelines |
| Florida Dept. of Agric. & Consumer Services |
* No specific apple regs * Use food processor GMPs |
* Plan to inspect all manuf., but none process fresh
* Samples may be collected |
* No special labeling is required |
* Information about hazards has been provided to juice industry |
| Idaho Dept. of Health & Welfare |
* No regs covering interstate operations (5)
* Intrastate firms (1) are covered by general food processing GMPs |
* 3 firms to be inspected under FDA contract
* Samples will be taken at 2 firms |
* No special labeling is required |
* No educational information has been provided |
| Illinois Dept. of Health |
* No specific apple regs
* Have voluntary guidelines for certification
* Use food processor GMPs |
* Plan to inspect all manuf.
* Sampling will be done at each firm |
* No special labeling is required |
* Worked with industry to develop a "Safe Cider Maker" certification program which includes training, testing, & HACCP plan requirements |
| Iowa Dept. of Inspections & Appeals | No specific apple regs |
* All firms will be inspected |
* No special labeling is required |
* No information provided |
| Indiana Dept. of Health |
* No specific apple regs
* Use food processor GMPs |
* Plan to inspect all manuf.
* Sampling will be done at each firm |
* No special labeling is required |
* In process of developing material to distribute this fall |
| Maryland Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene |
* No specific apple regs
* Use food processor GMPs |
* Will inspect all manuf. twice – Preoperational & operational Sampling will be done at each firm |
* No special labeling is required |
* Will conduct education program for all processors Cooperative Extension will offer HACCP training program * Will conduct studies of effectiveness of sanitary controls |
| Massachusetts Dept. of Health & Human Services |
* Specific regs are provided under GMP regulation |
* Plan to inspect ½ of manuf. (16 of 32)
* Local Health to inspect retail operations
* Sampling is optional |
* No special labeling is required |
* Yearly workshop provided
* All operations have state guidelines |
|
Michigan Dept. of Agric. |
* Specific GMPs are provided under general food GMP regulation |
* Plan to inspect all manuf.
* Sampling is done at each firm |
* No special labeling is required but is recommended in GMPs |
* Two cider workshops held
* Mailing to each processor with info packet |
| New Jersey Dept. of Health & Senior Services |
* No specific apple regs
* Used a supplemental report to survey cider operations
* Use wholesale food GMPs |
* Some firms may be inspected under FDA contract
* Big inspection effort in 1993-94
* No sampling is planned |
* No special labeling is required |
* Educational information was provided in 1993
* Recommended washing and brushing & the use of sodium benzoate to inactivate E. coli O157:H7 |
| New York Dept. of Agric, & Markets |
* Specific GMPs and guidelines are provided under general food GMP regulation |
* Plan to inspect all manuf.
* Sampling is done at each firm as needed |
* No special labeling is required, but pasteurization labeling is recommended |
* Educational information was provided
* Processing guidelines were provided |
| Oregon Dept. of Agric. |
* No specific apple regs
* Use food processor GMPs |
* Plan to inspect all manuf.
* Sampling is done randomly |
* No special labeling is required |
* (Yes, but no details provided) |
| Pennsylvania Dept. of Agric. |
* No specific apple regs
* Use 21CFR110 |
* Plan to inspect all manuf. |
* No special labeling is required |
* None provided to date |
| Virginia Dept. of Agric. & Consumer Service |
* No specific apple regs
* Use 21CFR110
* Have grading requirements |
* Plan to inspect all manuf. * Sampling is optional |
* No special labeling is required |
* Information packet sent out by Apple Board with materials on GMPs and HACCP, and meeting held with apple growers
* HACCP training courses held in March & May |
| Washington Dept. of Agric. |
* No specific apple regs
* Use 21CFR110
* Have grading requirements |
* Plan to inspect all manuf.
* Sampling is optional |
* No special labeling is required but it is recommended |
* Yes (but details not provided) |
| Wisconsin Dept. of Agric. Trade & Consumer Protection |
* No specific apple regs |
* Plan to inspect all manuf.
* Sampling is done |
* Pasteurization label is recommended but not required
* Recommend "keep refrig" statement at retail |
* Provided 1 day seminar/ workshop
* Held regional meeting with growers/ processors |
| ADDITIONAL DATA FROM U.S. APPLE SURVEY OF STATE PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES | ||||
| Connecticut Dept. of Health |
* New guidelines for cider processors
* Drops approved until 11/97 – no machine harvesting |
* Pre-operational inspections for all processors |
* Labeling for all unpasteurized product is required |
* Producers required to participate in training session on harvesting and processing requirements |
| Illinois |
* Dept of Public Health & State Horticultural Society developed voluntary "Certified Safe Cider Maker" program which includes training, inspections, and sampling
* State Horticultural Society has produced a model HACCP plan and recommended harvesting and plant sanitation SOP’s | |||
| Indiana |
* Indiana Horticultural Society provided producers with information on the issues about juice safety, and included sessions on sanitation and HACCP at their annual meeting | |||
| Iowa Dept. of Inspections & Appeals |
* Working with Dept of Agric, Iowa State Univ. and Iowa Fruit & Vegetable Growers Assoc to develop a voluntary certification program and training | |||
| Kentucky Dept. of Health |
* No specific apple regulations |
* All cider mills are inspected |
* Univ of Kentucky has developed apple specific GMPs, "Ensuring the Safety of Cider"
* Industry in cooperation with Univ of Kentucky is developing a Model HACCP Plan to be available Fall 1998 | |
| Maine Dept. of Agriculture |
* No specific apple regulations |
* All cider producers are inspected regularly |
* Production guidelines are provided by Dept of Agric, Maine Apple Growers, Food and Rural Resources and Univ of Maine Cooperative Extension based upon Massachusetts’ model | |
| Massachusetts |
* Massachusetts Cider Guild developed specific GMPs based upon Purdue Univ guideline, "Suggestions for Proper Sanitation in Indiana Cider Operations" | |||
|
Michigan |
* Michigan Apple Cider Advisory Committee developed specific GMPs for cider manufacturers and is developing a HACCP pilot program | |||
|
Minnesota Dept of Agriculture |
* Specific apple rules have been developed |
|||
| New Hampshire Dept of Agric. Markets & Food |
* Specific apple rules have been developed |
* Labeling is required which specifies if the cider is pasteurized |
* Univ of NH Cooperative Extension has provided recommended GMPs for cider operations and HACCP workshops for cider producers | |
| New York |
* New York Apple Association in cooperation with the State Departments of Health, Department of Agriculture and Markets, and Cornell Univ. conducted a cider safety seminar in March 1997. | |||
| Ohio Dept of Agriculture |
* Updated mill inspection rules in 1997
* New legislation on cider GMPs expected |
* Regional cider schools have been held for two years by the Ohio Apple Marketing Program
* Dept of Agriculture and industry sponsored GMP and HACCP seminar in 1997
* Working with Ohio Grocers Assoc. on "Keep it Cold" program | ||
| Pennsylvania Dept of Agriculture |
* Working with the Pennsylvania Apple Marketing Program to develop a state task force on cider safety to sponsor a seminar on cider safety, and a HACCP training workshop in early 1998
* Pennsylvania Horticultural Society to publish recommended GMPs for cider producers | |||